Publications

Publications:

Leinenger, M. (in press). Survival Analyses reveal how early phonological processing affects eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. [PDF] [Markdown file]

Schotter, E.R., von der Malsburg, T., & Leinenger, M. (in press). The impact of forced fixations on word recognition: Dissociation of oculomotor behavior and linguistic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. [PDF]

Schotter, E. R., Leinenger, M., & von der Malsburg, T. (in press). When your brain skips what your eyes see: How forced fixations lead to comprehension illusions in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

Leinenger, M. & Rayner, K. (2017). What we know about skilled, beginning, and older readers from monitoring their eye movements: Implications for teaching reading. In J. A. León & I. Escudero (Eds.) Reading Comprehension in Educational Settings. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Leinenger, M., Myslín, M., Rayner, K., & Levy, R. (2017). Do resource constraints affect lexical processing? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 82-103. [PDF]

Schotter, E. R. & Leinenger, M. (2016). Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 2039-2067.

Leinenger, M., Schotter, E. R., & Rayner, K. (2016). Models of the reading process. In H. Miller (Ed.) Encyclopedia of theory in psychology. SAGE.

Leinenger, M., & Rayner K. (2015) Eye movements and visual attention during reading. In J. Fawcett, E. F. Risko, & A. Kingstone (Eds.) The Handbook of Attention. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Leinenger, M. (2014). Phonological coding during reading. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1534-1555. [PDF]

Higgins, E. M., Leinenger, M. & Rayner, K. (2014) Eye movements when viewing advertisements. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00210. [PDF]

Leinenger, M. & Rayner, K. (2013). Eye movements while reading biased homographs: Effects of prior encounter and biasing context on reducing the subordinate bias effect. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 665-681. [PDF]

Becker, M.W. & Leinenger, M. (2011). Attentional selection is biased toward mood-congruent stimuli. Emotion, 11, 1248-1254.

Manuscripts Under Review or In Preparation:

Leinenger, M. (in prep). The time course of phonological coding in deaf readers: Evidence from survival analyses of eye movements.

*Barker, E., Schotter, E.R., Leinenger, M. (in prep). How sight-singing strategies differ between     voice types: Evidence from production errors.

Leinenger, M. (in prep). Effects of phonemic decoding ability and reading skill on the time course of phonological coding during reading.

*Barker, E., Schotter, E.R., Leinenger, M. (in prep). The effect of pitch complexity on eye movements during musical sight-reading.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s